And now for something completely different: Football and Twitter

So, my studies mostly focus on political communication, journalism and ethnic minorities and migrants in the media. But some time ago, my former student, Leon Mulder, collected cool data on football players’ positions, their scoring capabilities and their basic track record. We then collected their Twitter data. The study attempts to answer the question of what explains online popularity: performance on the football pitch or performance on Twitter? To be honest, we were surprised nobody ever took on this question before. But here we are, a new publication:

Vergeer, M. & Mulder, L. (2019). Football players’ popularity on Twitter explained: Performance on the pitch or performance on Twitter? International Journal of Sport Communication.

The link to the article is https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2018-0171. Below is the abstract.

Abstract:

This study tested football players’ performance on the pitch against their performance on Twitter as explanations for Twitter popularity. Guided by network theory, social-identity theory, and basking in reflective glory and using data of all players of all teams in the Dutch premier league (“Eredivisie”), the multilevel models show that players with a Twitter account were more popular when they scored more goals, were non-Dutch, were on loan at another club, and were networkers actively following others on Twitter. The findings also show that context matters. Players under contract with a successful club receive an automatic bonus: Irrespective of their performance on the pitch or on Twitter, they automatically acquire more followers on Twitter. Players in general do not need to put a lot of effort into communicating on Twitter because sending tweets is unrelated to having more followers. Advertisers’ best options to reach larger and homogeneous audiences through football players are to choose attackers, scoring players, those out on loan, and foreign players, as well as players from successful teams in general. The study also identified which player characteristics do not add to a larger audience reach, such as tweeting behavior and experience on Twitter.

http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_32.png http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_32.png http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_32.png http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_32.png http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/myspace_32.png http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_32.png http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_32.png

New study about the journalists’ perceived credibility of online info and their checking behavior

About a week ago my study about journalists’ perceived credibility of online info and their checking behavior. Below is the abstract of the article, which was published in Observatorio (OBS*). I hope you enjoy the read.

This study focuses on the extent journalists verify information provided by online sources, and tests to what extent this verification behavior can be explained by journalists’ perceived credibility of online information and other factors, such as journalism education of journalists, work and Internet experience, and work environment (broadcasting, newspapers, Internet). Although several studies have focused on perceived credibility of online information, none have tested its effect on actual verification behavior. This study will perform that test.
Using a sample from the membership database of the Dutch Association of Journalists, a web questionnaire was used to ask journalists about their opinions, behavior, and professional background characteristics. Regression analysis was used to test the hypotheses.
Analyses show that journalism education does not affect journalists’ verification behavior, neither directly nor indirectly via perceived online source credibility. Perceiving online information as less credible does not lead to verifying online information more extensively. Journalism education only affects the extent journalists perceive online (semi-) governmental information as less credible.
The findings question the role of formal and informal professional socialization in training journalists to become professional journalists adhering to professional standards.

Reference:

http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_32.png
http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_32.png
http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_32.png
http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_32.png
http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/myspace_32.png
http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_32.png
http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_32.png

New publication on social media and social movements in South Korea

Late December 2015 our chapter Voicing Discontent in South Korea. Origins and Channels of Online Civic Movements by Se Jung Park and myself was published in The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics and edited by Axel Bruns, Gunn Enli, Eli Skogerbø, Anders Olof Larsson, and Christian Christensen. The edited book consists of a large and diverse collection on social media and politics.

Our chapter consists of three sections. The first section “South Korea’s Path to Wealth and Democracy” is a brief look into South Korea’s recent history of developing into a democracy and economic prosperity driven by Korea’s technology industry (cf. Samsung, LG). The second section focuses on the distinct Korean Web culture and its fast Internet infrastructure. The third section focuses on the sociopolitical relations in South Korea’s collectivist culture. Using World Values Survey data we compare South Korea to other countries, in terms of confidence in political institutions such as parliament and government, civil services, and political parties. In the following section three cases on social movements and social media are presented: Candlelight protests, citizen journalism: OhmyNews, and Gangjeong Movement. The subsequent section focuses on Internet regulation and Election Laws in South Korea, followed by the conclusion.

A big thank you to the editors for inviting to contribute and a special big thank you to Nicki Hall, the project coördinator, for managing this project. More information about the book can be found on the publisher’s website Routledge and on Amazon.

Below are some pictures of a 2008 Candlelight protest that turned violent, the Sewol Candlelight protest of 2014 as well as some videos of recent protests (November 2015) against president Park Geun-hye’s policies. Although these protests are violent, according to experts (mentioned in the first video) South Korea is in a transition to peaceful rallying.

http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_32.png
http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_32.png
http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_32.png
http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_32.png
http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/myspace_32.png
http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_32.png
http://blog.mauricevergeer.nl/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_32.png